For-profit138 bedsAccredited
Operated by OMNI Health Care
Copper Terrace is a for-profit long-term care home in Chatham, licensed for 138 beds. It is accredited. Below you can find its full Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection record, Health Quality Ontario care indicators, and how it compares with the Ontario average.
Calculated by the Ministry of Long-Term Care, as of April 30, 2026.
Resident-care measures for the 2023/24 fiscal year (a single year, not a multi-year average), compared with the Ontario average.
In the most recent findings, 3 of 6 care measures are higher than the Ontario average: Falls, Antipsychotic use, and Worsened depression. Physical restraints and Pain are lower than the Ontario average, while Pressure ulcers are similar. For these measures, a lower percentage means fewer residents were affected.
Source: Health Quality Ontario / Ontario Health.
519 King Street West, Chatham
320 beds
110 Sandys Street, Chatham
99 beds
10 Mary Avenue, Blenheim
65 beds
16 Fort Street P.O. Box 160, Tilbury
75 beds
9 Myrtle Street, Ridgetown
40 beds
These figures come from the Ministry inspection reports listed below. For each measure, the bar shows the most recent complete year and the chart shows every year on record, both compared with the Ontario average.
1 of 4 inspection measures is higher in 2025 than the Ontario average: Compliance orders. Fines per bed are lower than the Ontario average, while Total findings and Written notifications are similar.
Where Ministry inspectors cited this home, across all inspections from 2022 to 2026. Each bar is split into compliance orders, written notifications, and items remedied on site; open an area to see it year by year.
Care-quality indicators are published by Health Quality Ontario, drawn from resident assessments.
Compliance figures are computed from the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection reports for this home.
See our full methodology →Last updated May 21, 2026.
Showing 22 of 22 reports
The summary is AI-generated and can contain mistakes. Always rely on the original Ministry report for decisions.
Inspectors found that the home did not ensure a resident's substitute decision-maker was involved in developing and implementing changes to the resident's plan of care when a new health condition required a change in care.