ReportONCare
Ontario Toronto Long-term care

Isabel And Arthur Meighen Manor

Non-profit168 bedsAccredited

Operated by The Governing Council Of The Salvation Army In Canada

Isabel And Arthur Meighen Manor is a non-profit long-term care home in Toronto, licensed for 168 beds. It is accredited. Below you can find its full Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection record, Health Quality Ontario care indicators, and how it compares with the Ontario average.

Waiting list711 people on the list

Calculated by the Ministry of Long-Term Care, as of April 30, 2026.

Care quality vs Ontario

Resident-care measures for the 2023/24 fiscal year (a single year, not a multi-year average), compared with the Ontario average.

Quick read

In the most recent findings, 6 of 6 care measures are lower than the Ontario average: Falls, Physical restraints, Antipsychotic use, Pressure ulcers, Pain, and Worsened depression. For these measures, a lower percentage means fewer residents were affected.

This homeOntario average
Falls
FY 2023/2024
This home
10.6%
Ontario average
16.6%
6.0 pts below the Ontario average
0%10%20%14/1516/1718/1920/2122/2323/24
Physical restraints
FY 2023/2024
This home
0%
Ontario average
1.8%
1.8 pts below the Ontario average
0%5%10%14/1516/1718/1920/2122/2323/24
Antipsychotic use
FY 2023/2024
This home
15.6%
Ontario average
20.5%
4.9 pts below the Ontario average
0%15%30%14/1516/1718/1920/2122/2323/24
Pressure ulcers
FY 2023/2024
This home
1.2%
Ontario average
2.3%
1.1 pts below the Ontario average
0%2.5%5%14/1516/1718/1920/2122/2323/24
Pain
FY 2023/2024
This home
2.9%
Ontario average
4.6%
1.7 pts below the Ontario average
0%5%10%14/1516/1718/1920/2122/2323/24
Worsened depression
FY 2023/2024
This home
16.8%
Ontario average
20.8%
4.0 pts below the Ontario average
0%17.5%35%14/1516/1718/1920/2122/2323/24

Source: Health Quality Ontario / Ontario Health.

Inspection record vs Ontario

These figures come from the Ministry inspection reports listed below. For each measure, the bar shows the most recent complete year and the chart shows every year on record, both compared with the Ontario average.

Quick read

3 of 4 inspection measures are higher in 2025 than the Ontario average: Total findings, Compliance orders, and Written notifications. Fines per bed are similar to the Ontario average.

This homeOntario average
* 2026 is a partial year, still in progress.
Total findings
2025
This home
22
Ontario average
12.9
Homes of 160 to 255 beds
16.9
9.1 above the Ontario average
012.5252023202420252026*
Compliance orders
2025
This home
2
Ontario average
1.3
Homes of 160 to 255 beds
1.7
0.7 above the Ontario average
02.552023202420252026*
Written notifications
2025
This home
20
Ontario average
11.6
Homes of 160 to 255 beds
15.1
8.4 above the Ontario average
012.5252023202420252026*
Remedied on site
2025
This home
0
Ontario average
0
Homes of 160 to 255 beds
0
about the same as the Ontario average
02.552023202420252026*
Fines per bed
2025
This home
$7
Ontario average
$7
Homes of 160 to 255 beds
$10
$1 below the Ontario average
05102023202420252026*

Compliance areas

Where Ministry inspectors cited this home, across all inspections from 2022 to 2026. Each bar is split into compliance orders, written notifications, and items remedied on site; open an area to see it year by year.

Compliance ordersWritten notificationsRemedied on site
Year by year
2026
2
2025
3
2024
7
2023
4
2022
Where this comes from

Care-quality indicators are published by Health Quality Ontario, drawn from resident assessments.

Compliance figures are computed from the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection reports for this home.

See our full methodology

Last updated March 20, 2026.

Inspection history

Year
Month
Category
Finding type

Showing 17 of 17 reports

Care planningNutrition & dining

The summary is AI-generated and can contain mistakes. Always rely on the original Ministry report for decisions.

  • Plan Of CareCare planning

    Inspectors found that the home did not provide a meal item to a resident according to what was documented in their plan of care. The resident was unhappy and did not eat their meal as a result.

  • Plan Of CareCare planning

    Inspectors found that a staff member provided personal care to a resident without a second staff member present, contrary to what the resident's plan of care required.

  • Dining And Snack ServiceNutrition & dining

    Inspectors found that a resident was served a meal that did not match their prescribed food texture requirement, and staff confirmed there had been no recent change to that requirement. The home did not have an effective process to ensure staff were aware of residents' dietary needs.

Read the full official report
Reporting & complaintsMedication
Care planningFalls
Residents' rightsCare planningEnvironment & safetySkin & woundNutrition & diningInfection preventionPrograms & admin
Infection preventionResponsive behavioursReporting & complaintsEnvironment & safety
Care planningSkin & woundInfection preventionEnvironment & safety
Nutrition & diningInfection preventionResidents' rightsCare planningReporting & complaintsResponsive behaviours
Care planningPrograms & adminInfection prevention
Responsive behaviours
Programs & adminReporting & complaints
Environment & safetyRestraints & mobilityResidents' rightsCare planningAbuse & neglectReporting & complaintsStaffing & trainingResponsive behavioursInfection prevention
Care planningRestraints & mobilityNutrition & diningPrograms & adminReporting & complaints
Reporting & complaintsResponsive behaviours