For-profit154 bedsAccredited
Operated by Southbridge
Thorntonview is a for-profit long-term care home in Oshawa, licensed for 154 beds. It is accredited. Below you can find its full Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection record, Health Quality Ontario care indicators, and how it compares with the Ontario average.
Calculated by the Ministry of Long-Term Care, as of April 30, 2026.
Resident-care measures for the 2023/24 fiscal year (a single year, not a multi-year average), compared with the Ontario average.
In the most recent findings, 1 of 6 care measures is higher than the Ontario average: Falls. Physical restraints are lower than the Ontario average, while Antipsychotic use, Pressure ulcers, Pain, and Worsened depression are similar. For these measures, a lower percentage means fewer residents were affected.
Source: Health Quality Ontario / Ontario Health.
1635 Dundas Street East, Whitby
136 beds
80 Glen Hill Drive, Whitby
160 beds
82 Park Road North, Oshawa
175 beds
590 Oshawa Blvd. North, Oshawa
300 beds
600 Oshawa Blvd. North, Oshawa
200 beds
These figures come from the Ministry inspection reports listed below. For each measure, the bar shows the most recent complete year and the chart shows every year on record, both compared with the Ontario average.
2 of 4 inspection measures are lower in 2025 than the Ontario average: Compliance orders and Fines per bed. Written notifications are higher than the Ontario average, while Total findings are similar.
Where Ministry inspectors cited this home, across all inspections from 2023 to 2026. Each bar is split into compliance orders, written notifications, and items remedied on site; open an area to see it year by year.
Care-quality indicators are published by Health Quality Ontario, drawn from resident assessments.
Compliance figures are computed from the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection reports for this home.
See our full methodology →Last updated June 2, 2026.
Showing 19 of 19 reports
The summary is AI-generated and can contain mistakes. Always rely on the original Ministry report for decisions.
Inspectors found that the home did not complete required assessment tools when residents were readmitted from the hospital. Specifically, a continence assessment was not completed for one resident, and a pain assessment was not completed for another resident, contrary to the home's own continence care and pain management policies.