For-profit96 bedsAccredited
Operated by OMNI Health Care
Pleasant Meadow Manor is a for-profit long-term care home in Norwood, licensed for 96 beds. It is accredited. Below you can find its full Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection record, Health Quality Ontario care indicators, and how it compares with the Ontario average.
Calculated by the Ministry of Long-Term Care, as of April 30, 2026.
Resident-care measures for the 2023/24 fiscal year (a single year, not a multi-year average), compared with the Ontario average.
In the most recent findings, 5 of 6 care measures are higher than the Ontario average: Falls, Antipsychotic use, Pressure ulcers, Pain, and Worsened depression. Physical restraints are lower than the Ontario average. For these measures, a lower percentage means fewer residents were affected.
Source: Health Quality Ontario / Ontario Health.
628 Old Norwood Road, Havelock
128 beds
320 6th Line East, Campbellford
43 beds
97 Mill Street, P.O. Box 68, Warkworth
60 beds
19 Fraser Street, Lakefield
100 beds
58 Bursthall Street, P.O. Box 429, Marmora
84 beds
These figures come from the Ministry inspection reports listed below. For each measure, the bar shows the most recent complete year and the chart shows every year on record, both compared with the Ontario average.
4 of 4 inspection measures are higher in 2025 than the Ontario average: Total findings, Compliance orders, Written notifications, and Fines per bed.
Where Ministry inspectors cited this home, across all inspections from 2022 to 2026. Each bar is split into compliance orders, written notifications, and items remedied on site; open an area to see it year by year.
Care-quality indicators are published by Health Quality Ontario, drawn from resident assessments.
Compliance figures are computed from the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection reports for this home.
See our full methodology →Last updated June 25, 2026.
Showing 19 of 19 reports
The summary is AI-generated and can contain mistakes. Always rely on the original Ministry report for decisions.
Inspectors found that the home did not provide clear written directions to staff about a specific intervention a resident needed during meals, and the intervention was not provided.