Non-profit160 beds
Operated by County Of Oxford
Woodingford Lodge - Woodstock is a non-profit long-term care home in Woodstock, licensed for 160 beds. It is not accredited. Below you can find its full Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection record, Health Quality Ontario care indicators, and how it compares with the Ontario average.
Calculated by the Ministry of Long-Term Care, as of April 30, 2026.
Resident-care measures for the 2023/24 fiscal year (a single year, not a multi-year average), compared with the Ontario average.
In the most recent findings, 4 of 6 care measures are higher than the Ontario average: Falls, Pressure ulcers, Pain, and Worsened depression. Physical restraints and Antipsychotic use are lower than the Ontario average. For these measures, a lower percentage means fewer residents were affected.
Source: Health Quality Ontario / Ontario Health.
81 Fyfe Avenue, Woodstock
163 beds
325 Thames Street South, Ingersoll
34 beds
263 Wonham Street South, Ingersoll
80 beds
94 William Street South, P.O. Box 400, Tavistock
43 beds
32 William Street S, P.O. Box 460, Tavistock
128 beds
These figures come from the Ministry inspection reports listed below. For each measure, the bar shows the most recent complete year and the chart shows every year on record, both compared with the Ontario average.
4 of 4 inspection measures are lower in 2025 than the Ontario average: Total findings, Compliance orders, Written notifications, and Fines per bed.
Where Ministry inspectors cited this home, across all inspections from 2023 to 2026. Each bar is split into compliance orders, written notifications, and items remedied on site; open an area to see it year by year.
Care-quality indicators are published by Health Quality Ontario, drawn from resident assessments.
Compliance figures are computed from the Ontario Ministry of Long-Term Care inspection reports for this home.
See our full methodology →Last updated May 21, 2026.
Showing 17 of 17 reports
The summary is AI-generated and can contain mistakes. Always rely on the original Ministry report for decisions.
The home did not conduct an annual evaluation of residents' satisfaction with the range of continence care products in consultation with residents, substitute decision-makers, and staff. The home has since added a survey question to assess this satisfaction going forward.